Some times it just goes sideways. Well, here is the tale of the Bank of England. It's sordid. And, highlights not only 'past is not necessarily future' theme, but (not explicitly, alas) that macro data is almost wholly sample data, and of unknown quality. Now, governments could, with simple legislation, enforce data collection of interest in signficantly larger, more stratified, samples. Or go Full Monty with census data. Doesn't happen, for the most part (there are, in the USofA, 'census' of some sectors). The reason that doesn't happen isn't cost, but rather that The Powers That Be at any time (whether left or right wingnut) want the 'flexibility' to implement some policy with the excuse that more granular data just isn't conclusive or up-to-date. The prime fig leaf for liars.
[The Bank] added that it would need to put in "substantial investment" to develop the data, modeling and staff to support the forecasts. The changes will take a while to put in place, and the bank will provide an update on its progress before the end of the year.This is the report of the Review. Further, if you feel up to it, I don't right now, here's the Review.
No comments:
Post a Comment