Bias

The reporting on the competing summary judgment motions in the Dominion/Fox suit hasn't, that I've found so far, answered the ultimate question. Which is: aren't judges supposed to be unbiased and not give a rat's sphincter about who wins? That's what is said, more than once (sans the rat reference), on "Law & Order". So what gives with the judge saying, in his ruling

"The evidence developed in this civil proceeding demonstrates that [it] is CRYSTAL clear that none of the Statements relating to Dominion about the 2020 election are true," Davis wrote in a 80-page decision notable for the tough stance it took against Fox's legal defense.

I suppose, and The Little Woman has been asked to ask her DC lawyer (ret.) to confirm, that Fox cooked its own goose by suing for summary judgment. In order to rule, the judge had to say why he ruled as he did. And he did with both crystal clear barrels.