Stupid Is As Stupid Does

The fact is, I'm torn between concluding that Kim Jong-Don is pathologically evil or ditto stupid. Today we have his pronouncement that Federal regulation process is now, by his fiat, blown up. He, or Bannon (who knows better, or ought to), asserts that agencies make up regulations over their weekly poker games at high end DC men's clubs. Well, no. Federal regulations, published daily in the Federal Register, are the agencies' responsibility to implement legislation passed by Congress into statute. You want to halt regulations? Shut down Congress. You're really, really close after just a week.

C'mon guys, if you're going to lie, at least be creative.

Betting Line

OK, so Kim Jong-Don has gone into blatant dictator mode, ignoring all agency heads in issuing the Muslim ban. So we're left with the over/under times to suspending the Constitution and declaring martial law (starting with Chicago, of course).
1 week
1 month
1 year

Cast your vote. Vote early and often

R.U.R. for Our Times

R.U.R. meets RoboCop?

The thinking folks have been banging the drum that Kim Jong-Don is a con man, who managed to convince 77,000 idiot white folks in the Alabama areas of three otherwise rational Northern states that their problems are caused by dark folk, rather than the billionaire class of Kim Jong-Don. The biggest of the Big Lies from Kim Jong-Don and his cabal is that China, et al are the cause of manufacturing employment's decline. Not close to true. Which has been mentioned here once or twice. All that "carnage" trumpeted by Kim Jong-Don in the Rust Belt North started with the capitalists fleeing to the union busting American South. Those 77,000 angry white folks most definitely voted against their own self interest. Reagan played that card, and so have Republicans ever since.

The editors at the NYT give their headline writers rather a long leash, it appears. Today's story describing what's really been going on carries the title "How to Make America's Robots Great Again". Cheeky, that. But true, of course. Of note: robots really were invented and developed in the USofA; still are, too.

In 2016, the United States hit a manufacturing record, producing more goods than ever. But you don't hear much gloating about this because manufacturers made all this stuff without a lot of people. Thanks to automation, we now make 85 percent more goods than we did in 1987, but with only two-thirds the number of workers.

Stated more explicitly, we make 85% more stuff with 33% fewer humans; not as one might immediately think, 85% more stuff with 33% more folks. In the words of economists, productivity has soared. In the words of capitalists, they've kept nearly all of the added value of that productivity. Wages for those still working in manufacturing should also have soared. But thanks to the likes of the lunatic right, all those good paying jobs don't exist. Demonizing Chinese and Mexicans won't change that.

In 2013, China became the world's largest market for industrial robots, according to the International Federation of Robotics, an industry trade group. Now China is working on another big goal: to become the largest producer of robots used for factories, agriculture and a range of other applications.

I'll remind Gentle Reader of the outcome of the Trump/Pence Carrier shadow dance:

GREG HAYES: Right. Well, and again, if you think about what we talked about last week, we're going to make a $16 million investment in that factory in Indianapolis to automate to drive the cost down so that we can continue to be competitive. Now is it as cheap as moving to Mexico with lower cost of labor? No. But we will make that plant competitive just because we'll make the capital investments there.

JIM CRAMER: Right.

GREG HAYES: But what that ultimately means is there will be fewer jobs.

The standard whipping boy of the lunatic right, who are clearly conflicted, is the unionized auto worker. On the one hand, they've spent decades demonizing such folks, just the Rust Belt angry white folks who're now out of work. But, now of course, Kim Jong-Don claims that he's their savior. Baloney, of course. Here's a detailed analysis of the way the world really was, at the time of the auto rescue.

A final note on all this: Labor costs only account for about 10 percent of the cost of producing a vehicle.

With further robotics, I'd wager even less in 2017. As one component of cost diminishes in absolute share, cutting said cost by X% means less and less to total cost reduction; you don't get X% total cost reduction. It's that pesky arithmetic, again.

IOW, unskilled uneducated white folks will never again live the life of 90210. And dark folks have nothing to do with it. Despite the Big Lies from Kim Jong-Don.

Thought for The Day - 25 January 2017

Now that we know Kim Jong-Don has been using a civilian quality phone, likely forever, enquiring minds want to know: how much dirt does NSA already have?

Damn You Kellyanne!

As I was rousing from an unsatisfying sleep this morning, a jingle was forming. Said jingle might be used by itself as a very short "Thought for The Day" or perhaps extended into a more lengthy essay. Said jingle went like this:

now that "alternative facts" have been deemed a normal convention of debate, can Newspeak be far behind?

In due time I got to this machine and fired up Firefox, and there on my home page, with circles and arrows and a paragraph describing each one (bow to Arlo) was this: "1984" sales soar following Kellyanne Conway's "alternative facts" statement

Orwell's classic -- a dystopian tale of a society in which facts are distorted and suppressed in a cloud of "newspeak" -- was in the top 5 on Amazon.com as of midday Tuesday. The sales bump comes after the administration's assertions that Trump's inaugural had record attendance and Trump's unfounded allegation that millions of illegal votes were cast against him last fall.

Needless to say, I'm annoyed. It would have been such a yuuuuuuge crowd pleaser.

If It Walks Like a Duck

One might suppose that there remain a few knuckleheads out there who still think that The Donald is on the side of the 99%. Well, the last couple of days he's generated enough Kim Jong-Don ink to show those with functioning brains, may be not.

Those evil (now 5 million) illegals all voted for Hill:

Richman [co-author of one debunked report on illegals voting] also said that in order for that to be the case, it would "require a truly massive increase in non-citizen voting and Trump lost by far too much for it to be accounted for by non-citizen participation."

Even Paul Ryan has called bullshit on this

House Speaker Paul Ryan said Tuesday that he has seen "no evidence" to back up President Trump's claim that 3 to 5 million illegal ballots cost him the popular vote.

Of course, he's well aware of delegitimizing a President, since he pushed that on Obama for six years. The problem is that his attack was fictitious (and he knew it), while his legitimacy exists only if one holds one's nose. Tightly. Paranoid schizo personality, in spades.

So, now he's going after the facts.

Interior gets attacked for telling the truth about the inauguration crowd.

The Interior Department was ordered Friday to shut down its official Twitter accounts -- indefinitely -- after a National Park Service employee shared two tweets that noted President Donald Trump's relatively small inaugural crowds compared to the numbers former president Barack Obama drew in 2009.

EPA gets muzzled for telling the truth

The executive director for the advocacy group Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, Jeff Ruch, said the orders go beyond what has occurred in prior presidential transitions.

"We're watching the dark cloud of Mordor extend over federal service," Ruch said Tuesday, referring to the evil kingdom in the epic fantasy, The Lord of the Rings.

While Thoma is considered a lunatic lefty by the Redneck crowd, he's called it with this piece

He might even try to underfund or actually eliminate agencies that report things that suggest his administration isn't the best economic machine to ever come to Washington.

Once a dictator, always a dictator.

The Asymptote of Progress - part the first

A continuing theme here has been exemplified by Gordon's book, which thesis was obvious to your humble servant long before the book was published. I expect, given this missive's title, more such.

On various forums, I've been the Debby Downer when the discussion turns to predicting future tech. Since much of such tech is mobile and semiconductor driven. And that means, perforce, battery driven. More function demands more power. Give me Power!!! And I've had the temerity to point out that battery power density hasn't moved much, certainly not on the order of magnitude scale, in a very long time. The counter argument has been, 'well, as nodes get smaller, they get more power efficient, so stable power availability doesn't make so much difference'. But we know that as nodes get smaller leakage and capacitance control go from nuisance to significant.

There are other issues. "The primary challenges will be contact resistance reduction and channel mobility improvement for better performance," Lam's Pan said. "We also need innovations to reduce parasitic capacitance."

Even if smaller nodes can be made, why would you?

In fact, it costs $271 million to design a 7nm system-on-a-chip, which is about nine times the cost to design a 28nm device, according to Gartner. "Not that many people can afford to (design chips at 10nm and 7nm) unless they have a high-volume runner and can see a return-on-investment," said Samuel Wang, an analyst with Gartner.

Ah, that old average cost, "we lose money on each widget, but make it up with volume" meme.

Or,

It is the middle ground between light and shadow, between science and superstition, and it lies between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge. ... It is an area which we call the Asymptote Zone.
[sorry about that, Rod]

Which brings us to today's autopsy of Samsung's burning batteries. In an effort to provide the oomph needed to drive function, they slid through the asymptote and over the cliff.

For batteries from both companies, the use of high-energy density cells increased the risk for thermal runaway during a short circuit, especially when the battery was in a high state of charge.

The NYT, on the other hand, notes (hehe) that design issues existed as well.

But battery scientists, including those who spoke at the announcement, said aggressive decisions in designing the batteries made problems more likely. Pushing to make the battery thinner and more powerful, Samsung opted for an exceptionally thin separator in its battery. As the critical component that separates the positive and negative electrodes in a battery, separators can cause fires if they break down or contain flaws.

While the tale is primarily one of manufacturing FUBAR, this was all driven by the demand for yet more power out of a shrinking volume envelope. It all started with Jobs (let's blame Steve; we do for everything else that goes sideways) tossing a prototype iPod into an aquarium, seeing the bubbles, demanded that said air spaces be eliminated. "Make it smaller."

You can't "alternative facts" your way around the asymptote.

Addicted to Big Data

Well, just got back from my dead trees NYT and coffee, and opened up my home page (CBS News), and see this item titled:

A way to predict who'll become a drug addict

So, I says to me self: "just another Trumpista; white uneducated unskilled guy". Well, yeah when I got about half way through came this -

A typical person with a chronic injury who might become dependent could be a middle-aged white male factory worker with a bad back.

Of course, he's just the guy who'll be tossed off Obamacare by King Donald, either explicitly or through the simple expedient of very much higher prices.

Travelers isn't in it to be nice, but to cut costs. Is this a good use of Big Data? May be. Would be good to know what the false positive rate is: how many are "encouraged" to not use opiates but really should be?

Is there some correlation between opioid addiction and Trump addiction? Well....

Of course, the Brits have the gonads to call a spade, a spade

There are strong correlations in most of the key states between a swing in favour of Trump and counties with lower income earners, white population, older voters, people with less education and a greater rural population.

IOW, stupid shit kicking white trash are the government. swell.

Pig Latin

What King Donald said:

We are transferring power from Washington, D.C. and giving it back to you, the people.

What he really said:

The Red states will take every last nickel left in the Blue states, so they can handle snakes and fuck their sisters.

Thought for The Day - 19 January 2017

OK, Donald, here's the last week you can blame Obambi for the USofA's troubles.

In the week ending January 14, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 234,000, a decrease of 15,000 from
the previous week's revised level. The previous week's level was revised up by 2,000 from 247,000 to 249,000.

This week is your week, and the next few until you're impeached. Put your money where your mouth is. Create 90210 jobs for all those shit kicking, snake handling, poorly educated, old white folks (you know, the ones with ancestors that frolicked with dinosaurs) in the empty states. I dare you.

The Death of The Financial Quant

In a couple of days, co-incident with some other ceremony of note, we will have the internment (or pyre, whichever you prefer) of the financial quant. RIP. For, with the ascendance of The Donald to the throne, the adage, "what matters is who you know, not what you know" will be all that does matter.

The country, from municipalities to DC, is now under the thumb of the lunatic right. Check history, and you'll see the results: depression, deflation, and deprivation for the majority. Here's a review; the Wiki, too. You'll see that macro-economic carnage follows the lunatic right around like a sick puppy. What both reviews miss is that when the Senate has been in Republican hands with a Democrat in the White House, they've used the cloture rule to impose de facto control, so control of Washington is even more stark than the numbers show. Will the Democrats grow a set of gonads, and do the same to protect their constituents (many of whom were stupid enough to vote against their own best interest)? One can hope. The root problem: the lunatic right has always been in thrall to Rand (even before she put mania to page), which means a determination to destroy governance, they seek anarchy which allows the rich to pummel the rest; while the left has always believed that governance was not only necessary but beneficial, at least for the majority. See, for example

Pruitt doesn't see it that way. In a March 2015 column he co-wrote with Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul for The Hill, Pruitt called the Clean Water Rule "the greatest blow to private property rights the modern era has seen." Pruitt and Rand maintain that states should be responsible for protecting the environment within their respective borders, not the federal government. Never mind that air and water pollution do not honor political boundaries and state legislatures are all too often dominated by corporate interests.

Externalities matter, if governance is a true priority.

So, what to expect? Well, tax cuts for the rich, which will trickle down, of course. Don't they always? Killing the ACA will have, as the Brits say, knock-on effects. Over the last few decades, FIRE and healthcare have been the dominant growth sectors.

Health care and real estate dominate a list of the country's 15 most profitable privately-held businesses, according to a report released Wednesday by Sageworks, a financial information company.

So, kill the ACA (and give back the tax moneys to the rich which help support it), and you reward the money changers. What can we expect if more moolah is gifted on the 1% and .1%? Let's look at recent history. The DotBomb happened because there was excess idle moolah lying around, looking for some place to inhabit. Well, the InnterTubes was obviously an easy way to make money, so a lot of that idle money flooded in. Then it became clear that any old web site wouldn't be a money printing machine, and so Kaboom!!! But, all that idle money pile kept growing. It looked for good return, but less risk than that damned InnterTubes thing. What might that be? Well, of course!! Why didn't they think of it sooner?? Residential mortgages had always been safe, and paid more than Treasuries ever did. But, on their own, they're hard to trade, so the mortgage companies and banks figured out how to bundle them up into tradeable securities. Tada!!! But, another but, the ever growing pile of moolah meant a level of aggregate demand for these securities far in excess of what traditional banking practice could produce as input into the sausage factory of securitization. So, the mortgage companies invented liar loans, and thus a better supply of raw meat for the sausage machines.

We don't, so long as the Fed doesn't fall into the hands of the more rabid Goldman Sachs alums, have that avenue anymore. The outcome will be more of the same; ever more moolah from the 1% and .1% chasing Treasuries (and thus, long term interest rates down), low to non- inflation since the 99% have ever less money, and thus low growth because macro-economic growth only happens when the middle class has most of the current and growing money. It's all about aggregate demand. If you want growth you have to have growth in aggregate demand (Laffer be damned). And if you want that, most of the money has to be in the hands of folks who both want and need to spend it. The 1% and .1% sit on their idle money, and demand that the damn gummint raise interest rates to at least 10% so they can grow their idle pile ever higher. They don't spend it and they don't invest in productive capital. Well, if such capital kills off a bunch of jobs, then may be.

But what will move the economy, for better or worse, won't be in the data, but in the policy events which dub the winners and execute the losers. Now, one might argue that this has always been true, and financial quants still managed to find employment. To some extent that's true. It's also true that a good deal of their effort was devoted to circumventing the rules of engagement: liar loans, LIBOR fiddling, London Whale, security ratings, and the like. It's just that the next few years, until The Donald is tossed out along with enough Republicans, will be utterly corrupt. One might be able to game that, of course, but that's not traditional quant.

So, as has been asserted here more than once, events drive the data. Data doesn't drive events, mostly. Detecting money flow changes, before the herd, can make you a lot of moolah. But the retail plunger doesn't have access to the data and compute cycles needed to benefit.

And, for the cherry on top, here's the maps of fat people in the USofA. You'll not be surprised that stupid and fat and Red all go together.

Here are the 10 states with the highest obesity rates.

1. Louisiana: 36.2%
2. Alabama: 35.6%
2. Mississippi: 35.6%
2. West Virginia: 35.6%
5. Kentucky: 34.6%
6. Arkansas: 34.5%
7. Kansas: 34.2%
8. Oklahoma: 33.9%
9. Tennessee: 33.8%
10. Missouri: 32.4%
10. Texas: 32.4%

Thought For The Day - 11 January 2017

Given the "Access Hollywood" material, doesn't the notion of Russian honey traps make perfect sense? Two gigantic dots with a really short line betwixt them. So far, I've not heard or seen any of the dishonest media point out this obvious fact.

The Real Villian

On and off, the thread of how the Great Recession came to be appears in these endeavors. The lunatic Right has, from the beginning, sought to blame Bill Clinton, long out of office when the boom started, much more so when it collapsed, and the Community Reinvestment Act (1977!). This attempt has always been propaganda, seeking to shift blame from the laissez faire W. banksters to inner city dark folks trying to buy a house. Various studies have been done over the years, and many have been mentioned here. All have put the lie to such narrative. The evil was in the white suburbs, non-bank mortgagers (CountryWide), and private mortgage insurers (MGIC). Doesn't fit the lunatic right's propaganda, of course.

Today, Mark Thoma reviews yet another study, from the Sloan School (that's MIT, by the way; another elite Eastern establishment). The Great Recession wasn't caused by poor folk trying to have a home, but by middle income white folks in white suburbs in sunny climes (Florida, Nevada, California, mostly) looking to flip McMansions that were experiencing rocketing prices. Caused by the demand for securitization instruments demanded by the Giant Pool of Money seeking high return on low risk. "Money for nuthin and the chicks are free."

The comments are replete with lunatic rightwingers bleating loudly. As it ever was.

It's Always The Arithmetic

A few times, these endeavors have made mention of the fact that average cost is what really matters to the MBA Masters of The World, not the marginal cost of economists. Folks like the putative Labor Secretary Puzder, who prefers robots to people in his production, just assume that machines are better than people. Leaving aside, for the moment, that machines don't take their value add based wages and buy output, capitalization based production does have, at least, one downside: fixed cost.

Here's a note from today's briefing.com:

The two operating units at the Indian Point Energy Center will close in 2020-2021 after powering New York for more than four decades with clean, safe, and reliable electricity. The early and orderly shutdown is part of a settlement under which New York State has agreed to drop legal challenges and support renewal of the operating licenses for Indian Point, located in the Village of Buchanan in northern Westchester County. The shutdown will complete Entergy's exit from its merchant power business because of sustained low wholesale energy prices.

In other words: with energy conservation, and alternative sources, the amortization of nukes might not make sense. There's more evidence of the problem. Don't put those panels on your roof!!

Industry officials say they support their customers' right to generate electricity on their own property, but they say rooftop solar's new popularity is creating a serious cost imbalance. While homeowners with solar panels usually see dramatic reductions in their electric bills, they still rely on the grid for electricity at night and on cloudy days. The utility collects less revenue, even though the infrastructure costs -- from expensive power plants to transmission lines and maintenance crews -- remain the same.

Now, apply the same complaint to healthcare... Reduce demand (by fiat of King Donald of Orange) for capacity already installed, and you'll find the 1% squealing that their healthcare costs have actually gone up.

It's always that damned arithmetic. That a six year old understands. Read the whole Post story, and you'll see that much of the rhetoric is just propaganda, and the tentacles of Koch is documented. And, whatever happened to The Cube?

It Had to Happen

For some time, years in fact, this endeavor has banged the drum for R in database. PL/R on Postgres was the choice for quite a while. Now we have R in SQL Server, and more publicly as time goes on.

Thanks to the folks at simple-talk, we get a link to this piece. With SQL Server soon to be standard product on linux (if not exorbitantly priced), we all get to do this sort of thing.

Equal and Opposite Reaction

From Newton, his third law:

When one body exerts a force on a second body, the second body simultaneously exerts a force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction on the first body.

We're knee deep in a reactionary socio-political period, and not to ignore the trend some of our programming crowd is moving to a reactive paradigm. Similar word roots, but very different meaning. Reactionary behavior in application development has been on the warpath since Dr. Codd first revealed the relational model, best expressed as COBOL coders of my acquaintance, "we prefer to do transactions in the client"; we don't need no central data control. With java (and other languages, in time), we entered the world of ORMs (I don't think I've run across this piece before, but it sounds like something that'd show up here). Much of the defense of ORM is that there is an impedance mismatch between the RM/SQL and OO. These missives dismissed that bunk years ago, but I felt so alone...

Recently, I came across this rather lengthy discussion. Yes, there is no inherent mismatch at the semantic level. Yes, there is the demand of client coders that all data belongs to them. And, yes, the comments reveal as much about client oriented coders as the text. The point missed, on purpose I expect, by the OOers claiming the IM, is two points:
1 - the database's purpose is to provide the constructor data for the object
2 - the vast majority of java/OO applications don't even have real objects anyway; they disappeared by Y2K (I was there and was sorely disappointed) and were replaced by DataObject/ActionObject (with various names, of course), which are just client-oriented COBOL/VSAM (or C struct) programming in more au courant languages. One need only read Allen Holub's Bank of Allen and his late 90s writings to see what might have been. (Yes, long time reader has seen these links before.)

The end of the preamble of this endeavor is echoed in this comment on the post on reactive programming linked:

#BigPipes are stealthily enmeshing the US and most CSuites (and people in general) are utterly clueless about the data volume thruput implications of a gigabit real-time internet of things.
-- Ed Dodds

Which is good. But then there's this:

Because the more I thought about Reactive the clearer it became that businesses, not just infrastructures, need to act in this way. The age of long term planning is long gone. Circumstances change and they [change] fast.

Taking the reactive metaphor and turning around and defending the olde reactionary code/file paradigm. No thanks.

With innterTubes getting universally fast, as I have called it: the world of host-terminal development has come to the innterTubes; your web browser is just a VT-220 (with pixels) connected to some database someplace else, it's just that RS-232 is now TCP. The disconnected client need no longer be the standard for transactional systems.

What happened? Or rather, hasn't happened. Why hasn't reactive database taken over the world. Let's have a look.

It's been a couple of years now that reactive programming will be the next big thing. There's also been some push that database driven applications would be based on the reactive paradigm. (Espresso Logic, the source of that link was bought up by Computer Associates/CA.) After all, reactive programming is "declarative", which is the essence of the RM/SQL database. Reactive programming is, by most definitions, event driven programming with a push (i.e., in the other direction back to the user machine) requirement: changes in the datastore are sent (immediately?) to all clients holding the data. Think about that for a second. The typical archetype is the computer spreadsheet: change a cell value, and it propagates to any referencing cells (either or both formula/macro), including cascades beyond a simple parent/child structure. Is it really the right basis for a relational database? Not really. Remember ACID?? Yet, may be.

So the spreadsheet is the common example of reactive: a single user, in memory, instantly updating calculator. Does it make any sense to transfer such a paradigm to a multi-user, durable storage, transaction (ACID) engine? Well, no. Nevertheless, a search brings up some lengthy writings on the virtues of reactive database development. Hmmm. How does changing data on the client as buffered data changes on the server keep ACID? Well, such a method destroys ACI. So, while it sounds sexy, not so much.

First, and perhaps most notably, if you read up these links (and many others resulting from a search on 'reactive database programming' and the like) they all set a parent/child frame of reference (hehe) for OO language objects. They're still living in a hierarchical mindset, but I'll credit them with trying to break out of that straitjacket. But the problem remains of focus: the world is truly relations, not hierarchies. Focusing on the notion of reactive forces data relationships out of the hierarchical paradigm, yet the context most often presented remains parent/child. Disconnect.

In database terms, we have the twin twins of force/no-force and steal/no-steal. Which combination you choose determines how reactive your engine is. The most common implementation is steal/no-force, which is reactive: clients would see changes as they happen in buffers if column level locking were supported.

One can note that the MVCC paradigm pioneered by Oracle is opposite to reactive: MVCC isolates client data from changes by other clients. Not such an easy platform for reactive. Unlike fail fast, it's fail last.

A question which shows up on various database forums: "Why can't I have column (within a row) level locking? After all, if I obey the Prime Directive, 'data is about the key, the whole key, and nothing but the key so help me Codd', Jack and Jill changing different (independent, not key) columns on a row at the same time doesn't violate ACID." Even using standard locking or MVCC, last update wins, still. The "NO" answers are that the lock table would be too large for practical purposes, and that the minimum I/O on any OS is rather larger than even the row, the most common lock level in use today. Depending on the machine/OS the smallest I/O is sector/block/page/extent and the like. Commodity 3.5/2.5 inch today are hard formatted to 4K. Mainframe machines these days use such drives, and emulate CKD formatting on top of the hard formatting. Committed data doesn't exist until the engine sends I/O buffer(s) to the OS for write.

For the moment, let's have a suspension of disbelief, and consider how the user screen would behave with a reactive database/application. Taking Jack and Jill as the basis, we'll say that Jack needs to update WEIGHT and Jill needs to update COLOR on row ABC of table FOO, and that COLOR and WEIGHT are dependent only on the key of FOO and don't participate in any mutual constraints. In other words, the database developer has done a proper job of it. If Jill changes COLOR from Red to Blue first, then Jack would see his screen image of row ABC flicker with COLOR morphing. If Jack had only used normal applications, he'd likely freak out. "Demons have infected my PC!!!" But, we'll assume that he'd been told that he's using a new real-time updating application. So, after the first few times his screens update automagically, he'll most likely not even notice. Real-time changes to "other" data rapidly become "just the way the application works". Hell, it's just like Excel!!! Way cool beans.

Can this be done in the real world? Actually, I think so. In memory database means that I/O can be at the byte level (finessing file I/O semantics, of course; some/most engines have the option to use disk in raw mode, skipping file semantics and managing I/O itself, today) with 5NF schemas, which means the row/column level. The lock table issue remains, to some extent, but with 64 bit machines and terabytes of memory and SSD used for virtual memory, maybe not so big a deal.

In the end, yes, a reactive database application is not only possible, but desirable.

Thought For The Day - 5 January 2017

One might not expect to find a missive dripping with rural entitlement and arrogance on the op-ed page of the NYT, but here it is. Comments are closed, but they're quite amusing. Given that NYT readers are, I expect, dominantly urban, but their anger is justified. I sent off a comment on the author's home site, much like many of the comments on the piece. The rural uneducated aren't just stupid, but arrogant in their stupidity. Lord help us.