tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8891277981056105369.post2052229094572931873..comments2023-12-24T18:24:10.671-05:00Comments on Dr. Codd Was Right: Danger Will Robinson, AgainRobert Younghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09056808374481236610noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8891277981056105369.post-7430581599886941442014-08-20T19:47:21.506-04:002014-08-20T19:47:21.506-04:00That would be it. A tip of the Hatlo Hat. :)That would be it. A tip of the Hatlo Hat. :)Robert Younghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09056808374481236610noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8891277981056105369.post-54738297991731177532014-08-20T16:57:26.045-04:002014-08-20T16:57:26.045-04:00Reading it reminded me of a quote from Stroustrop,...<i>Reading it reminded me of a quote from Stroustrop, but for which I cannot vouch, since I've long lost the cite.</i><br /><br /><a href="http://www.stroustrup.com/01chinese.html" rel="nofollow">This interview</a>, maybe?<br /><br /><i><b>C++ View:</b> It's said that Java is purely object-oriented, while C# is even more. And many people say they are purely money-oriented. What's your opinion?<br /><br /><b>Bjarne Stroustrup:</b> I like the term "money-oriented" :-) I also like Andrew Koenig's phrase "buzzword-oriented". C++ is neither.</i>Adam Bradleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11785997295611369546noreply@blogger.com